Salman Rushdie's 'Imaginary Homelands'
I. World Behind the Text
·
Indo-Anglican
Seminar on Indian Writing in English at London in 1982 during Festival of
India.
·
It
was attended by Indo-Anglican writers: Nirad Chaudhari, Anita Desai, Raja Rao,
Mulk Raj Anand
·
During
the time period 1982
o
India
– Indira Gandhi’s rule
o
Pakistan
– Zia Regime & Execution of Ali Bhutto
o
Britain
– Thatcher Revolution
o
USA
– Ronald Reegan & cold war
·
Emergence
of new possibilities, uncertainties & dangers
·
In
such circumstances Salman Rushdie writes Midnight’s Children in 1981.
II. World in the Text:
·
The
text is a collection of 75 essays written from 1981 to 1992.
·
It
is an essay that propounds an anti-essentialist view of place.
·
This essay was written after
the publication of the Midnight’s Children. This was well responded in
western countries but in Indian it was rejected.
·
It is written out of pain to go
to the roots of one’s origin. The desire of belonging to somewhere,
it is desire of an individual to claim a country as his/her homeland.
·
Text
is divided into 12 sections comprising 6 major sections:
I – Work roughly grouped around Midnight’s
Children
II – Politics of India and Pakistan
III – Indo-Anglican Literature
IV – Movies and Television – Gandhi movie
V – 5 pieces of expressions &
experiences of Indian migrants to Britain
VI – 3 pieces of Thatcher Revolution: Margaret Thatcher's policies
as British prime
minister changed many
aspects of British life, and were collectively called Thatcherism
VII-XI – Writers of
Africa, Britain, Europe, South America & USA
XII – Reflection on Satanic Verse
III. Textual Analysis
Introduction
·
'Imaginary
Homelands' is the title essay of Salman Rushdie's collection of total 75
essays.
·
In
this piece, Rushdie describes the situation of those writers who are born in
one place and choosing to live elsewhere, fighting to get back
or to get away from their homelands.
·
According
to Rushdie: "exiles (deported) or emigrants (migrant) or expatriates (voluntarily
absent from home), are haunted (troubled) by some sense of loss, some
urge to reclaim, to look back.
ü The seed of the imaginary homelands were sown in the
indo-Anglican seminar at London. Mighty pens of Indian English writing
were present.
ü Some of the participants described Indian culture not as a rich
mixture of all inclusive tradition but an exclusive one (Sanskrit
sloga), though Christian, Parasi, Muslim, Sikh participants were present.
ü The second day, an eminent Indian academician delivered a paper on
Indian culture that utterly ignored all minority communities.
Writer and the Homeland
·
Rushdie
claims that any writer, who writes about his homeland from the outside, must
necessarily “deal in broken mirrors, some of whose fragments have been
irretrievably lost".
·
Rushdie
calls the migrants the "translated men" (having been borne
across the world, we are translated men, there may not be originality).
·
Rushdie
raises the point that duality in an author's identity: a dual sense of
identity from both culture – British and Indian, a geographical and
national identity, gender and race. He says: "Our identity is at
once plural and partial.” Sometimes we feel that we belong to two
cultures; at other times, that we fall between two stools.
Description
of India in Midnight’s Children
·
“Politician and writers are natural
rivals. Both groups try to make the world in their own image; they fight
for the same territory and the fiction is one way of denying the
official, politician’s version of truth.”
·
Some claim that the descriptive
of India that Midnight’s Children attempts, is very pessimistic.
But Rushdie denied that the book is nihilistic (lack of meaning). The form of
the story is optimistic.
·
He tried to set up a tension
in the text, a paradoxical opposition between form and content of the
narrative. He makes use of memory, magic realism and telepathy
(thought transference) which take us back to the ancient India.
Diaspora:
·
‘Imaginary Homelands’ is all
about feeling to belonging nowhere. The feeling of insecurity
always remains there in his mind which got reflected in his work.
·
He is a member of marginalized
group, member of Indian Muslim family in Bombay, a Pakistani, and
at present a British Asian. Thus, there is not a fix root which
he can claim.
·
In creating a story like “Midnight's
Children” he is in a way trying to establish a relationship that he has a
land somewhere he belongs to. As he writes “I too had a city and a history
to reclaim”.
·
Diasporic writers could not claim their belonging to the country and they could not
completely mingle with the new one, as the memory of the past doesn’t allow him/her
to accept it. They held up between two cultures, two languages, two nations,
and lost identity.
·
He declares that to live in
British society is to face everyday problems:
o
What does it mean to be an
Indian outside India?
o
How can culture be preserved
without become ossified (fixed)?
o
How to turn away our self which
one goes to another country?
o
How are we to live in the
world?
Conclusion
In the
conclusion of the essay, Rushdie compares a writer within himself with a dog
from the novel The Dean’s December. Protagonist Dean imagines dogs’
barking outside. The barking of the dog symbolizes the protest against his limit
of experience. “for god’s sake,” the dog is saying, “open the
universe a little more”. It is the limitation of the diasporic writers that
they were protesting, what they really want is to be accepted as a human being.
They need little more freedom of expression, and we have to accept them
as they belong to somewhere.
Salman Rushdie's
'Imaginary Homelands' portrays a migrant's inner conflict between his
strong urge to reclaim his homeland and his inability to
capture its true essence. This conflict leads the author to create a number
of "imaginary" homelands in his fictions such as, Indias of the
mind. These imaginary homelands capture the essence of reality as seen through
the eyes of characters who, like their author, face the challenge of straddling
two cultures.
No comments:
Post a Comment